The Big Takeaway
The Inside-Out Special Strength Model flips traditional programming by using real-world competition data as a direct feedback loop into the athlete’s neurological Point B. Exit velocity, sprint times, or on-field performance aren’t just outcomes—they reveal whether the neural network of absolute strength is fully expressed or being shielded by underlying joint dysfunction and a reactive strength deficit. Most coaches chase surface-level skill fixes when the nervous system is already protecting the athlete. Closing this gap with specific inside-out training (especially reactive strength) restores unrestricted output and high-performance emergence.
We reference Alan Burr (AB), Co-Director Strength and Conditioning Coach for the Pittsburgh Pirates—check out his Founder’s Meeting where he discusses Point A and Point B for the baseball athlete.
What We Cover in This Episode
Inside-Out Special Strength Model: Training and treatment start from the internal neural network of absolute strength and work outward to competition demands. This enables precise, data-driven programming instead of guessing.
Level of Adaptation vs. Level of Competition: Nested ecological structures. The Level of Competition (the diamond, field, court) serves as the ultimate feedback mechanism for what’s happening at the Level of Adaptation (inside the athlete). High-level organizations now use on-field KPIs to drive training decisions.
Neurological Point B: The ideal state where neurology and biology are unconstrained. Measured indirectly through behaviors like exit velocity (baseball), Nord Board isometric outputs, or sport-specific velocities. Drops or plateaus in these metrics signal the nervous system is not fully expressing capacity.
Feedback Loops in Programming: Positive (keep going), Negative (change something), Reiterative (maintain). Coaches like AB (exit velocity), the Steelers’ Tusz (Nord Board), and Indiana’s Derek Owens (player availability + velocity) compress these loops for highly specific programming.
The Tatis Jr. Case Study: Historic elite exit velocities (110+ mph) have dropped (still elite at 104–105 mph) alongside reduced production and positional issues in the swing. Hypothesis: not pure neurological regression, but neurological shielding from compromised joint function, spinal positioning, and reactive strength.
Continue reading for paid subscribers →
The real paradigm shifter—and the bit of information that almost everyone misses is…
